The note is written.
The judgement stays yours.
Clinical documentation from a conversation you recorded — eight templates that write down what was said, organised so a colleague can find it. They do not assess, diagnose, or propose. That is not a limitation we are apologising for. It is the product.
Most of what makes a documentation tool safe is what it declines to write. Both halves below are enforced by the same rules, applied to every template from one place.
The templates differ in their sections. Everything that makes them safe is identical, held in one place — so a rule tightened on one is tightened on all of them.
Headings drawn from what the conversation actually covered, in the patient's own terms.
Kontaktorsak, Aktuellt, Tidigare, Åtgärd, Plan — and deliberately no Bedömning.
Decisions, what was raised and not decided, what was postponed, and questions left unanswered.
Every outstanding item the conversation named, including the ones mentioned in passing.
What was said, what information was given, what was agreed. Advice is recorded, never completed.
What each party undertook, where they disagreed, and what nobody took responsibility for.
Never that anyone consented. Whether an exchange amounts to consent is a judgement, not a transcription.
A straightforward note from a recorded meeting, with the same source check as the rest.
An extract from a handover note, produced from a recorded conversation between two clinicians. Note where the lab result appears — twice, because it exists and because nobody has looked at it.
from Mondayexist — Anna referred to them.
I don't actually know.
My feeling is that she's moving in the right direction but that she under-reports how bad it is at home.
Anna's impression is quoted and attributed to her. It is not adopted as the document's own finding — that distinction is the whole of it.
Anyone can write “it does not diagnose” in a brochure. These are the mechanisms that hold it, and they are inspectable.
Every template includes the same rules rather than carrying its own copy, so none of them can quietly drift away from the others.
It reads the conversation and the finished note, and reports any statement that is absent from the source or has been interpreted. Its findings are appended to the note, not hidden in a log.
Not chosen by the model. Two notes carry the same headings, and a required section cannot go missing without the note saying so.
The consent record cannot state that anyone consented. That check runs in ordinary code, not by asking a model to remember — while the same words are left untouched inside a quotation, because somebody may have said them.
Per clinician, per month. No per-patient fee on this tier.
You choose your own username and password at sign-up. Already have an account? Log in.
Alba Notes produces documentation of a conversation. It does not assess, diagnose, screen, or propose treatment, and it is not intended to inform a diagnostic or therapeutic decision. It is not a medical device.
Every document is a draft for the clinician to read, correct and adopt. The clinician remains the author of the record and is responsible for its accuracy.
TalkToAlba's assessment products are a separate matter and are regulated as such. Nothing on this page describes them.